MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7008454135

Capital Flows to Latin America and the Caribbean: Third Quarter 2019

2019· other· en· W7008454135 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDIGITAL REPOSITORY Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (United Nations) · 2019
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMaterial Properties and Failure Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLatin AmericansQuarter (Canadian coin)BondVolatility (finance)DebtCapital marketCorporate bondCredit rating
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

These are the main highlights of the Capital Flows to Latin America, Third Quarter 2019 edition:
\n
\n• International bond issuance from Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) in the third quarter (Q3) of 2019 was US$ 39.3 billion. It was up 17% from the second quarter, and up 541% from the third quarter of 2018, and it was the highest third-quarter issuance since 2010. 
\n
\n• From January to October 2019, the region’s total bond issuance reached US$ 103 billion, 20% higher than in the same period in 2018. 
\n
\n• The three top issuers, sovereign and corporate issuance combined, accounted for 65% of the total issuance in the first ten months of 2019 – they included Mexico (30%), Brazil (23%) and Chile (12%). Corporate issuance represented 67.5% of the total. 
\n
\n• From January to October 2019, both Latin American stocks and debt spreads partially recovered from the rout caused by the increase in volatility and risk perception in global markets in the second half of 2018. The JPMorgan EMBIG Latin component tightened 144 basis points, while Latin American stocks gained 8.2% according to the MSCI Latin American index. 
\n
\n• On balance, credit quality has deteriorated this year. There were six credit rating upgrades and seven downgrades from January to October of 2019. In November, there was one more downgrade. When looking at all credit rating actions, including outlook revisions, there were eleven positive and eighteen negative actions year-to-date (as of November 22). 
\n
\n• Finally, there was a recovery in green bond issuances from the region. From January to October 2019, green bond issuances in international markets amounted to US$ 4.6 billion, which represented 4.5% of the region’s total international bond issuance. 
\n
\n• In June, Chile became the first sovereign in the region to issue green bonds

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.208
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it