Características del dolor en pacientes post operados de cirugía abdominal, en el Hospital San José de Chincha, año 2020.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Materiales y métodos: La investigación tendrá un enfoque cuantitativo y utilizará la observación, como técnica; el tipo de investigación es transaccional y el diseño descriptivo, para así explicar detalladamente el comportamiento de la variable en su estado espontaneo. Al utilizar el diseño descriptivo, se prevé que, sus limitaciones evidentes, son que no expresa relacionas de causa-efecto, ni genera nueva teoría. La unidad de análisis son los pacientes post operados de cirugía abdominal, en el hospital San José de Chincha. La población que se determinó en un periodo de atención de seis meses alcanza un total de 600 pacientes, los cuales, a través de un muestreo probabilístico, se determinó como muestra de 124 pacientes, sometidos a los criterios de exclusión e inclusión reglamentarios y al consentimiento informado, se utilizará el instrumento con escala de dolor de MCGILL, con el que se medirán las variables e indicadores
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".