Combustion characteristics of residential bed assemblies of various sizes and configurations tested in a room environment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents the results of a series of fire experiments that were conducted with residential bed assemblies in a room environment as part of Phase 1 of a project titled ?Characterization of Fires in Multi-Suite Residential Dwellings (CFMRD)?. The main objective of the CFMRD project is to characterize fires in residential dwellings and ultimately to develop design fires and methods for use in fire safety engineering analysis and design. Phase 1 of the project was intended to help design, for phase 2, fully-developed post-flashover fire experiments with fuel loads simulating various fully-furnished living areas. In addition, the results provided valuable insight into the combustion behavior of bed assemblies, which in residential fires originating in bedrooms, constitutes the primary first-ignited items of importance. As well, it provided data on combustion under realistic conditions in a room environment for such purposes as computer modeling or for evaluating the capabilities of existing correlations to predict flashover and room temperatures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".