MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7008474101

Cellulose nanocrystals as non-innocent support to the synthesis of ruthenium nanoparticles and their application to arene hydrogenation

2015· article· en· W7008474101 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced Cellulose Research Studies
Canadian institutionsCentre in Green Chemistry and Catalysis
FundersFPInnovationsCentre in Green Chemistry and CatalysisNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsMcGill University
KeywordsRutheniumNanoparticleCelluloseNanocrystalCatalysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ru nanoparticles were synthesized from RuCl 3 under mild H 2 pressure within a suspension of cellulose nanocrystals.X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and transmission electron microscopy revealed that the small Ru(0) nanoparticles (3.3 Æ 1 nm) were deposited onto their cellulosic support.This hybrid proved to be a highly efficient arene hydrogenation catalyst operational at 4 bars and room temperature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicAdvanced Cellulose Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207