A clash of kings. The European Committee of Social Rights on the âLex Lavalâ ⦠and on the EU framework for the posting of workers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On the 20 November 2013 the European Committee of Social Rights delivered its decision on the Swedish law aimed at bringing the Swedish system in line with the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union regarding posting of workers and industrial relations. The evaluation of the so-called 'Lex Laval' however provides for an occasion to implicitly scrutinise the whole framework of EU law regulating the posting phenomenon. The present contribution hence analyses the relationship of the decision delivered by the ECSR with two aspects of EU law. On the one hand, the contribution deals with the case law of the CJEU about the (complicated) relationship between fundamental social rights and fundamental economic freedoms of the internal market. On the other hand, it will examine the more specific issue of posting of workers. Both topics reveal the existence of a sharp contrast between EU-law and the system of values, principles and rights embodied in the European Social Charter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.011 | 0.012 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".