MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7008602340

The Community and Social Economy Movement in Québec: Development and Recognition(1989-2003)

2008· other· en· W7008602340 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueÉrudit documents and data repository (Érudit Consortium, University of Montreal) · 2008
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsBibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocial economySocial movementSocial assistanceSocial impactSocial democracy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Axes innovations sociales, travail et emploiLes membres de l'axe travail et emploi centrent leurs travaux sur l'organisation du travail, la rgulation de l'emploi et la gouvernance des entreprises dans le secteur manufacturier, dans la fonction publique et dans l'conomie du savoir.Les recherches portent sur les dimensions organisationnelles et institutionnelles de l'emploi et du travail.Elles concernent tant les syndicats et les entreprises que les politiques publiques et s'intressent certaines thmatiques comme les stratgies des acteurs, le partenariat, la gouvernance des entreprises, les nouveaux statuts d'emploi, le vieillissement au travail, la formation et l'conomie du savoir. LES ACTIVITS DU CRISESEn plus de la conduite de nombreux projets de recherche, l'accueil de stagiaires post-doctoraux, la formation des tudiants, le CRISES organise toute une srie de sminaires et de colloques qui permettent le partage et la diffusion de connaissances nouvelles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.472

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.008
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉrudit documents and data repository (Érudit Consortium, University of Montreal)French-language works237,207