A Case Study of Faculty Development Needs in Distance Education; presented at the International Council for Open and Distance Education, Santo Domingo, DO.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ICDE conference was held in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic and involved just over 400 participants. The conference was hosted by the Universidad del Caribe. About 90% of the attendees were faculty and administrators from the Latin American university community and the rest were from Canada, United States, Korea, Australia, and New Zeeland. On Sunday November 23, I attended convocation for 930 University de Caribe students at the invitation of the conference organizers. It was a very moving experience. Not only have these students faced and persevered in terms of academic achievements, but they live in a developing country where residents face severe socioeconomic challenges as well. \n \nThe conference itself took place from Nov 24-26, 2008. Key note speakers included: \n•\tDr. Michael Moore (Pennsylvania State University). His presentation was on his classic work on transaction distance in distance education \n•\tDr. Lalita Rajasingham (University of Wellington, New Zeeland. Her presentation was on her research and related projects on virtual reality, hyper reality and IT in terms of human communications. \n•\tSeveral other key note speakers were from the Latin American countries. \n \nEach day, after the key note sessions and panel presentations, we were able to attend several conference tracks. My presentation was on Monday November 24 and it was well received. It was very interesting to discuss with the participants, the challenges we face in terms of faculty development and to hear that they also face similar challenges. The paper I presented was one that Dr. Heather Kanuka and I had written. It was a final paper from the work we did on faculty development in our roles in the Take Time for Good Instructional Fun committee. \n \nPrior to the conference, I had a more insular perspective of faculty development and distance education because my research and teaching experiences have been in North American universities. I tended to think of the cost, access, and quality issues in terms of what we face on a daily basis. I came away from the conference with a deeper appreciation of how issues in distance education go much further than cost, access, and quality, when we take the challenges that developing countries face into consideration. I was also very moved by the level of commitment that the attendees have towards improving distance education for their students. For example, one colleague spoke about his regular trips involving long commutes to remote villages in Colombia to meet with students taking distance education courses. Another discussed the need to offer university programs that would help graduates get meaningful work that would help improve the countries and their economic challenges. Still another spoke about telemedicine programs being offered through partnerships with Canadian and American universities using their old technology. \n \nOn Monday evening, we went to the Uiversidad del Caribe for a book signing session that Dr. Marta Mena (ICDE Vice President for the Latin America and the Caribbean) had edited with a number of colleagues. This was followed by a festive Dominican dinner. \n \nThroughout the conference, we were able to network with many colleagues. It was very interesting to discuss distance education topics with them and to hear about the research they are doing. I also had the opportunity to talk to several students about their programs of study. In addition to my Power Point presentation, I am attaching a summary of the conference that was shared with us after the conference. I have uploaded my conference paper on my AUSPACE website. I received a conference CD at the conference and my paper and presentation is on the CD. \n \nOur university especially benefited because we were represented by Dr. Frits Pannekoek at the conference as the President of the ICDE (Canada) and Dr. Rory McGreal was in attendance and also presented a paper on learning objects. Athabasca University was well known to participants. When Dr. Michael Moore used a slide from his presentation on noted academics who have conducted research on distance education using related theories, I was able to recognize at least 5 names of Athabasca University faculty. \n \nIt was a privilege to have been able to attend this conference. In addition to the conference value, I was able to make additional academic contacts and learn/practice a bit of Spanish. I truly appreciate the funding support from the A&PDF Committee.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".