MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7008680131

From Crisis to Recovery: Analyzing Government Support for Canadian Restaurants during the COVID-19 Pandemic

2023· article· en· W7008680131 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCOVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubsidyGovernment (linguistics)PandemicWageQualitative researchQualitative analysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dr. Julie Kellershohn is an Assistant Professor at the Ted Rogers School of Hospitality and Tourism Management. Her research specializes in consumer decision-making and the impact of marketing and technology in the Foodservice Industry. She focuses on Away-From-Home food and beverage consumption, including Quick Service, Casual, and Full-Service Restaurants. Wayne W. Smith is a Professor at the Ted Rogers School of Hospitality and Tourism Management at Toronto Metropolitan University. His research focuses on tourism policy, consumer psychology and tourism pedagogy. He currently serves on the boards of TTRA Canada and ISTTE. Stephen W. Litvin is a professor of Hospitality & Tourism Management in the School of Business, College of Charleston. Steve received his DBA in International Commerce from the University of South Australia. His primary research interests relate to tourism’s economic and cultural impacts upon communities, tourism consumer behavior and the politics of tourism. Robert E. Frash recently retired after 30 years in food service, and 20 years in academia. He continues his research as Professor Emeritus at the College of Charleston in the USA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.418

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst)Same topicCOVID-19 Pandemic ImpactsFrench-language works237,207