Constitution and rules of order adopted by the Grand Association of the Province of Ontario held at Toronto, February 27th, 1894.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Being impressed with the fact that all parties engaged in commerce, manufactures, and all other enterprises of impor- tance, are organized and are using their combined ^influence for the promotion of their own special interests, while the farmers and employees upon whose labors depend the prospects of the nation are almost entirely unorganized : We, the farmers and employees of the Province of Ontario, believing that Almighty God, as the source of all power and the ruler of nations, should be acknowledged in all constitutions of societies, do hereby with due reverence to Him, associate ourselves together under the following articles, and the articles of incorporation of the Order of the Patrons of Industry, in the Province of Ontario, and the ^amendments made thereto, and do solemnly pledge ourselves, one to another, to labor togeth- er for the promotion of the interests of farmers and employ- ees, and the good of the nation, of which we are a part.ARTICLE I. NAME AND OBJECTS.This organization shall be ealled The Patrons op Indus- try of North America, and shall be composed of a Grand Association, and County and Subordinate Associations, and shall be an organization of farmers and others, whose inter- ests are identical with those of farmers, and its objects shall
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".