Child Welfare, Indigenous Children and Children’s Rights in Canada / Bem-Estar da Criança, Crianças Indígenas e Direitos da Criança no Canadá
Bibliographic record
Abstract
DOI: 10.1590/2179-8966/2019/40639 Abstract: In Canada, Indigenous children have been removed from their families and communities for residential schooling and for adoption and fostering by the state. These historic and ongoing policies have contributed to a general lack of awareness and respect for the rights of Indigenous children as children, as well as Indigenous rights bearers. This paper examines the ways in which historic Indigenous transracial adoption projects acted as a means of public education for ignorance, and argues there is an urgent need for increased public and academic attention to Indigenous children’s rights as both universal children’s rights and Indigenous rights.Keywords: Indigenous Rights, Adoption, Children.Resumo:No Canadá, crianças indígenas foram removidas de suas famílias e comunidades para educação residencial e para adoção e acolhimento institucional pelo estado. Essas políticas históricas e em andamento contribuíram para uma falta geral de conscientização e respeito pelos direitos das crianças indígenas desde uma perspectiva de suas condições como crianças, bem como de portadoras de direitos indígenas. Este artigo examina as maneiras pelas quais projetos históricos de adoção indígena trans-racista agiram como um meio de educação pública para a ignorância, e argumenta que há uma necessidade urgente de maior atenção pública e acadêmica aos direitos das crianças indígenas como direitos das crianças e direitos indígenas, ambos de caráter universal.Palavras-chave: Direitos Indígenas, Adoção, Crianças.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".