Competitividad del comercio exterior de la porcicultura mexicana en el Tratado de Libre Comercio de América del Norte
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The concept of competitivenessused in this work, is defined as the result ofor participation in international trade and canbe expressed as the capacity of a country,industry or a segment of a productive chain toconquer, maintain or increase its participationin the national and international market.The hog’s commercial competitiveness ofthe countries that the nafta conforms inthe period 1990 to 2004 was measured withthe following indicators: participation in theinternational markets (pmi), the coefficientof the revealed comparative advantage (vcr),rate of imports penetration (tpi) and theexhibition to the international competition(eci). In Mexico, pmi and vcr grew from0.02 to 0.8% and from 0.2 to 1.9%, due to theincrease of exports, which signifies an increasein competitiveness; in contrast the increasesin tpi and eci raised from 5.8 to 42.6% andfrom 5.8 to 41.2%, respectively, which reflectsthe high dependence of Mexico on hogimports, mainly from the United States. Betterindicators were obtained for the United Statesand Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".