MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7008730236

Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association Volume 52:4 (2016) - Content

2016· article· en· W7008730236 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLincoln (University of Nebraska) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEthics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupreme courtAssociation (psychology)Content (measure theory)Supreme Court DecisionsVolume (thermodynamics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ARTICLES 142 One Term, Two Courts: Selected Criminal-Law Cases in the Supreme Court’s 2015-2016 Term. 152 Harmful Effects of Child-Custody Evaluations on Children. 160 The Unsubstantiated Claims of Turkat’s Harmful Effects of Child-Custody Evaluations on Children. 170 Child Dead and Parent Charged with Murder After Psychologist Recommends Said Parent to Court: Turkat Responds to Gould and Posthuma’s Custody-Evaluation Fallacies. DEPARTMENTS 134 Editor’s Note. 135 President’s Column. 136 Thoughts from Canada. 178 Crossword. 180 The Resource Page.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.029
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score0.470

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.029
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0080.003
Scholarly communication0.0120.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0070.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1410.088

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLincoln (University of Nebraska)Same topicEthics and Legal Issues in Pediatric HealthcareFrench-language works237,207