MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7008768178

Contando tricksters: agentes de subversão/transgressão de relações de poder em Erdrich, Morrison e Hopkinson

2019· dissertation· en· W7008768178 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2019
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCaribbean history, culture, and politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTricksterPower (physics)SubversionAgency (philosophy)HatredHegemonyWickednessArgument (complex analysis)Representation (politics)Oppression
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In times of increasing dissemination of hatred and rise of state authoritarianism and institutionalized oppression, looking towards the power of the people, that endogenous power, constitutes in the largest agency that every citizen should practice in society. Provided that Literature promotes discussions, symbols and representations of this transformational rhizome, although corroded by the external structure, the use of the trickster figure urges. Tricksters are understood, and we endorse the place of the feminine, as multi(trans)faceted personalities and agents of strategies both discursive, and representational to face social injustices. In addition to this is the ability of tricksters to be agents of subversion and / or transgression within the scope of the racist, sexist, machist, lgbtqiphobic, and classicist hegemonic order. This research intends to investigate the trickster category and its possibilities of power relations agency, involving gender, race and class in three novels of a Native American, an African American, and a Jamaican Canadian, namely: The Antelope Wife, by Louise Erdrich (1998); Sula, by Toni Morrison (1973); Midnight Robber, by Nalo Hopkinson (2000). Epistemes are centered, fundamentally, on theoretical-philosophical basis that discusses the place of Native Americans and Afro-diasporic peoples in the Americas, as a guarantee of the place of speech. For our theoretical and critical discussions in Tricksters, we selected: Hyde (1998), Hynes; Doty (2003); Cunha (2005); Smith (1997); Gates Jr. (1988); Vizenor (1990). For issues on studies in Native American literature, intersectional feminism, transculturality, de-colonialism: Schneider (2001); hooks (1984); Davis (2016); Ribeiro (2017); Pratt (1999); Walter (2009); Costa (2015). We perceive different forms of tricksters in the novels mentioned that deal with power relations, sometimes subverting them, sometimes transgressing them. In The Antelope Wife storytelling, evidenced in the central narrator's discourse and in the focalization on various characters, brings a narrative multivocalization that subverts the linear order of narrativity and transgresses the hegemonic discourses of foundation narratives. In Sula, trickster Sula’s assertiveness uses Womanism sass, as verbal language and performativity, which subverts the racist and elitist patriarchy and transgresses "sacred" institutions like marriage. In Midnight Robber, the transcultural discursiveness in the diaspora confers the trickster character of Tan-Tan that performs the cultural pluriversality, subverting oppressions and transgressing borders, when dressed up of a mythical and folkloric Caribbean figure, besides other tropes of culture. Thus, in different and multi-aesthetic forms, the tricksters of the novels in analysis converge with respect to establish different places of speech and compose a collection produced by anti-hegemonic peoples that are circumscribed in the Native America, and in the Afro-diasporic America.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0130.027
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)→Same topicCaribbean history, culture, and politics→French-language works237,207→