MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7008791064

CovSocial Phase 2 – Investigating differential effects of socio-emotional versus mindfulness-based online trainings on acute stress reactions in psychosocial Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) during the Covid19-Pandemic

2021· other· en· W7008791064 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 2021
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrier social stress testPsychosocialPsychological interventionSocial supportLonelinessPsychological resilienceTest (biology)Prosocial behavior
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This investigation of differential effects of online mental trainings on acute psychosocial stress reactions is embedded in the CovSocial project, which consists of two phases. Phase 1 of the CovSocial project (www.covsocial.de) focused on longitudinal changes in a variety of markers of vulnerability, resilience and social cohesion during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic (osf.io/jvb98). Phase 2 of the CovSocial project investigates and compares the effectiveness of two online mental interventions in reducing stress and loneliness and increasing psychological well-being, prosocial behavior and social competencies in a subsample of the first phase (osf.io/3nsjc). Phase 2 participants were split up in three groups, of which two groups are each undergoing one of two 10-week interventions, that is, approximatively n=100 participants are undergoing a socio-emotional training and n=100 participants are undergoing a mindfulness-based training. Additionally, there is a retest control group of n=100 participants without training during the first 10 weeks, who will receive the socio-emotional training of 10 weeks after the other intervention groups have completed their posttest (see Figure 1). The standardized psychosocial stress test, Trier Social Stress Test (TSST; Kirschbaum et al., 1993) will be conducted as part of the phase 2 posttest. The additional implementation of the TSST is intended to complement the CovSocial project with findings regarding the acute stress response in psychosocial situations. The TSST is worldwide considered as a standard protocol for the induction of psychological stress under controlled conditions and has been routinely performed for over 20 years in numerous countries, most notably Germany, the USA, and Canada. Empirical studies on the impact of the SARS-CoV-2-pandemic have shown that there has been an increase in mental health problems in the general population (Dubey et al., 2020; Vindegaard & Benros, 2020; Xiong et al., 2020). Particularly, the related governmental restrictions of social interactions throughout lockdowns can be assumed to impose psychosocial stress, amplifying the impact of the pandemic on psychological well-being and mental health (Vinkers et al., 2020) Previously, it has been shown that mental training can be an effective way to reduce acute stress responses in psychosocial stressful situations (Engert et al., 2017; Morton et al., 2020). However, previous findings have been inconclusive in this regard (Creswell et al., 2014; Hoge et al., 2013), which has been attributed to differences in the type and duration of interventions (Morton et al., 2020). It was shown that especially those procedures in which social skills are trained, such as by the socio-emotional training developed by Singer et al. (2016), can be an effective way to reduce stress reactions in psychosocial stress situations (Engert et al., 2017). To test the effect of a socio-emotional training on psychosocial stress in the context of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, it is planed that n = 120 participants from phase 1 and 2 will take part at the TSST. This subsample consists of n = 40 participants who did the socio-emotional training, n = 40 participants who did the mindfulness training and n = 40 people from phase 1 who didn’t participate in any training and who will be used as a control group. During the TSST, psychological and biological parameters will be recorded from the subjects. Psychological data will be collected using questionnaires to be completed in the laboratory before and after the stress induction. Biological markers include saliva samples before and after the induced stress, which can be used to measure cortisol levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: Non-randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)→French-language works237,207→