The contribution by sacrifice on the sea in the Roman legal experience between the 1st century BC. and the first quarter of 4th century AD, by Francisco Barros Rodrigues Rocha. Argument in the Doctoral exams (Lisbon, March 5, 2021)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A arguição da tese de doutoramento procurou realçar, no tempo disponível, aspectos menos e mais bem conseguidos da obra. Concluiu pela excelência global da investigação, plenamente justificante da aprovação com a nota mais elevada. Entre os primeiros, essencialmente aspectos formais. Entre os segundos, entre outros, aspectos como a petição de Eudémone ao imperador Antonino, observações em torno da lex rhodia e do Nomos Rhodiwn Nautikos, questões ligadas ao pensamento decalístrato e sabino sobre o tema, o relacionamento processual com a locatio conductio e aexcusatio necessitatis e aspectos relacionados com o direito romano dos naufrágios e outros direitos antigos.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".