MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7008846669

Decolonization Through Words: Using Indigenous Languages to Revitalize Indigenous Culture in a Postcolonial Canada

2023· dissertation· en· W7008846669 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSkemman · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousDecolonizationGovernment (linguistics)Traditional knowledgeIndigenous cultureMeaning (existential)Human settlement
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper explores the erasure of indigenous culture and tradition, an ongoing issue in Canada since Europeans first arrived on the land, and how indigenous names can be employed to reclaim and represent the diverse indigenous cultures as well as promote healing amongst the indigenous population. The settlers imposed their own language and customs, leading to the loss of many important aspects of indigenous culture, including names. The names that described physical places were especially important, as they held a great deal of meaning for indigenous communities, often reflecting their history, spiritual beliefs, and cultural practices. The use of European names for indigenous places eradicated much of this cultural significance, leading to the loss of important knowledge and connections to the land. Furthermore, the renaming of indigenous individuals by Europeans was often done without considering their cultural traditions, leading to many indigenous people being assigned names that had no relevance to their cultural backgrounds. However, recent efforts have been made to reclaim and represent these lost cultures through the revitalization of indigenous names. Many communities have worked to regain control over the naming of their own settlements and geographical features, choosing names that reflect their cultural heritage, spirituality, and traditions.
\nThe impact of these efforts is examined in this paper, showing how words can be used to both erase and reclaim culture. Through an analysis of historical documentation, official government sources, and personal accounts from indigenous community members, this paper demonstrates the importance of names in the preservation and revitalization of indigenous cultures. In conclusion, the use of indigenous naming conventions is essential in the representation and expression of diverse indigenous cultures in Canada. By recognizing and restoring the cultural significance of names, the heritage of indigenous communities can be maintained for future generations, and the impact of colonial efforts can be countered. 
\nRemembering and acknowledging traditional names can help strengthen the ties between indigenous peoples and the land. Respecting indigenous history that predates the colonization of Canada will provide a sense of cultural affirmation and support generational healing and reconciliation for all individuals impacted by the erasure and appropriation of their languages and heritage. This respect and acknowledgment also encourage non-indigenous Canadians to better accept and co-exist with indigenous cultures, traditions, and heritages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.602
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSkemmanSame topicIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFrench-language works237,207