Critères socio-pédagogiques dans le choix des manuels d'enseignement du français langue étrangère (FLE) à l'Institut de Technologie du Cambodge (ITC) : étude à partir du manuel scolaire "Sciences et Communication"
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude a pour but de cerner les critères socio-pédagogiques qui guident les enseignants de français à l'Institut de Technologie du Cambodge dans le choix des manuels scolaires. Nous voulons étudier ce phénomène à partir de l'adoption récente à l'Institut de Technologie du Cambodge du manuel scolaire Sciences et Communication (méthode d'enseignement de français langue étrangère destinée à un public d'étudiants universitaires des secteurs scientifiques au Cambodge). Les enseignants disposent-ils de repères pédagogiques et sociaux précis qui motivent leurs suggestions et choix d'un manuel scolaire de langue ? Voilà la question qui structure cette recherche. \n
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".