MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7008881856

The Data Description Language EAST Specification (CCSD0010) - CCSDS 644.0-B-3

2010· article· en· W7008881856 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBiblioteca Digital da Memória Científica do INPE (National Institute for Space Research) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of Space and Astronautical ScienceNuclear PhysicsCanadian Space AgencyIndian Space Research OrganisationU.S. Geological SurveyNational Space OrganizationNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationKorea Aerospace Research InstituteEuropean Organization for the Exploitation of Meteorological SatellitesEuropean Space AgencyAgenzia Spaziale ItalianaCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsSoftwareSpecification languageConjunction (astronomy)Logical data modelData typeFormal specificationSet (abstract data type)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This Recommended Standard defines the EAST language used to create descriptions of data, called Data Description Records (DDRs). Such DDRs ensure a complete and exact understanding of the data and allow it to be interpreted in an automated fashion.A software tool is able to analyze a DDR, interpret the format of the associated data, and extract values from the data on any host machine (i.e., on a different machine from the one that produced the data). The current issue adds improvements/clarifications to the specification and adds a requirement to include the EAST version number in the logical part of a DDR..

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.130

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0060.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0090.007
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.066

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.157
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiblioteca Digital da Memória Científica do INPE (National Institute for Space Research)Same topicMathematics, Computing, and Information ProcessingFrench-language works237,207