MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7008887582

The creep behaviour of Magnesium-Manganese based alloys

2012· other· en· W7008887582 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2012
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCreepNucleationPrecipitationMicrostructureDeformation (meteorology)Ternary operationTemperature cyclingDislocation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The concern for weight-reduction in vehicles has increased substantially in recent decades due to fuel consumption regulations. Extending the use of magnesium (Mg), the lightest structural metal, in automotive powertrain applications has been one of the routes to reduce vehicle weights. In this doctoral work, the creep behaviour of Mg-Mn based systems with cerium (Ce) and/or strontium (Sr) additions is studied in order to shed light into the new design principles for the development of creep-resistant Mg alloys. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is used to characterize the microstructures (the orientation, coherency, crystal structure and the morphology of the phases) as well as the features of creep deformation (twins, dislocations, sub-grains). In the Mg-Mn binary system, the dynamic precipitation of α-Mn was observed upon thermal exposure and during creep. Two different orientation relationships (OR) were determined between α-Mn (rods) precipitated upon heat treatment and the α-Mg matrix. The creep mechanisms were determined to be dislocational processes based on the activation energy (Qc) values (Qc (pure Mg) = 105 and 168kJ/mole; Qc (Mg-1.4Mn) = 127 and 154kJ/mole) obtained via long-term creep tests at different temperatures. The creep strengthening effect of Mn was due to the dynamic precipitation of α-Mn on dislocations (acting as heterogeneous nucleation sites) during creep. In the Mg-Ce-Mn ternary system, the intradendritic precipitation of Mg12Ce occurred heterogeneously where α-Mn precipitates acted as nucleants. The nucleation and growth of the α-Mn and Mg12Ce precipitates were mutually affected by the presence of the other. The dislocational processes were found to be rate-controlling, hence, the refinement in the Mg12Ce precipitate size via α-Mn precipitates enhanced the creep resistance by providing effective dislocation pinning. In the Mg-Sr-Mn ternary system, a new orientation relationship (OR) was determined between the Mg17Sr2 and α-Mn phases, which resulted in differing morphologies of the dynamically precipitated α-Mn depending on the region of precipitation (interdendritic and intradendritic regions). Creep deformation was again found to be dependent on dislocational processes: pipe diffusion at low temperatures and either dislocation climb or activated cross-slip at the higher temperatures (Qc (JM51) = 99 and 234kJ/mole; Qc (JM52) = 93 and 135kJ/mole). The dynamic precipitation of α-Mn on the basal dislocations of the intradendritic regions enhanced creep resistance via pinning by coherency strain fields. Mg-Sr-Mn-Ce alloys exhibiting high creep resistance were developed. The design principles were based on the results obtained from the creep behaviour studies of the pure Mg, Mg-Mn, Mg-Ce-Mn, Mg-Sr-Mn systems, as well as thermodynamic calculations by FactSage. The microstructure of the alloys consisted of the Mg17Sr2 intermetallic phase at the interdendritic regions which strengthened the grain boundaries, and dissolved Mn and Ce which resulted in the dynamic co-precipitation of Mg12Ce and α-Mn (Sr) in intradendritic regions during creep. The creep strain of the quaternary alloys was around to be four times lower than the strain of the ternary alloys.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.146
Teacher spread0.142 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)→French-language works237,207→