MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7008904646

Conforto térmico de habitações em função do padrão construtivo

2015· article· en· W7008904646 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAmericanae (AECID Library) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban Arborization and Environmental Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSlumQuarter (Canadian coin)Relative humidityMasonryConstructiveSituated
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One searched from the monitoring of you beached a ship ambient to evaluate the thermal comfort in the inside of habitations in function of the constructive standard and of its disposals in the geographic and urban physical space. The methodology followed in the research proposal allowed that the slum quarter selected for such study was the Slum quarter of Canvas, situated in the Eustáquio Gomes Quarter, the City of Maceió, the State of Alagoas, for also presenting particularity in the arrangement of its habitations and in the constructive profile of these, beyond its disposals in improvised the urban space, come if to show as segregated urban scene when compared with immediate its around. Two habitations of black canvas and one of masonry of conventional, situated standard had been selected constructive next the slum quarter habitations, not being this third considered typical one of slum quarter. Where in them they had been installed in its interiors dataloggers, that they had allowed to monitor in the period of 01 the 31/03/2007, to collect temperatures and internal relative humidity of air that allowed to understand the dynamics evaluative of its internal microclimates, being complemented to this study the temperatures collected in the exterior of these, given meteorological relative to the deriving Maceió city of the Meteorological Station of the Zumbi of Palmares Airport in Maceió, And also of the shelter installed in the exterior of the analyzed habitations. According to given conclusive: all the habitations if had presented with levels of comfort in a platform that indicated inexistence of any type of comfort, the masonry habitation total presented it a comparative bigger thermal isolation with the habitations of black plastic canvas and of black canvas and the asbestos cover, that is, less vulnerable to the external thermal variation, had the biggest thermal resistance of the constituent materials of this typology, on the other hand, the consisting habitation total of black canvas presented critical levels of very intolerable discomfort and the habitability in more than 75% of the analyzed hours due the inefficiency of the arrangement and configuration architectural, low inertia and thermal resistance and form of use that it became the habitation with the greenhouse profile, for confining hot air in its interior. Habitation 2, of black canvas and asbestos cover, was presented total uncomfortable but, less uncomfortable if compared with the coated one with black canvas, since the same one took off advantage of the geographic orientation, the use of vegetation in around of the inexistence of internal walls providing the existence of the crossed ventilation, overlapping cardboard use the internal faces of the walls come to confer a thermal inertia bigger if compared with the habitation 1 and thermal retardation of its constructive materials, being this more tolerable construction the habitability. One expects that in research subsequent to this, can be more used other meteorological parameters and other diversities of consisting habitations of constructive materials with distinct characteristics and the use of instruments of collections sophisticated, that allow to represent faithful and to interpret the real situation of the evolution dynamic of internal and external microclimates of the habitations white of the research, the point of being able to intervene in the space constructed and inhabited of form to guarantee levels of comfort to its users.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmericanae (AECID Library)Same topicUrban Arborization and Environmental StudiesFrench-language works237,207