MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7008946077

DENSITY-DEPENDENT CATCHABILITY OF SPOT PRAWNS (Pandalusplatyceros ) OBSERVED USING UNDERWATER VIDEO

2014· article· en· W7008946077 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine and fisheries research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrawnFishingCrustaceanUnderwaterTrap (plumbing)Decapoda
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding how fishing gear catches target species is an important part of understanding the impacts of commercial fishing. Here, we use underwater video to investigate the catch dynamics of spot prawn (Pandalus platyceros) traps, a fishing gear used in a large commercial fishery in British Columbia, Canada. We report, for the first time, interactions that occur as prawns accumulate in traps during the first eight hours of trap deployment at depths between 75 and 100 m, and test whether catchability of prawns depends on the density of prawns in and around traps. We found that prawn catchability decreased as the number of prawns in the trap increased. This process was driven by a diminishing proportion of approaching prawns that made entry attempts, as well as a reduced likelihood of entry attempts being successful as traps filled with prawns. Very few prawns exited traps during observations, but final catch rates demonstrated that exits must have occurred after the termination of our videos. Recording and examining the full 24 hours of a typical soak would clarify how trap saturation is achieved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.115
Threshold uncertainty score0.228

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)→Same topicMarine and fisheries research→French-language works237,207→