MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7008950393

Decesos es un ramo rentable para los corredores : [Entrevista a] Carlos Díez, director del Canal Corredores de Santalucía

2016· other· es· W7008950393 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMAPFRE (Fundación Mapfre) · 2016
Typeother
Languagees
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicTransport and Economic Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeadlineNova scotia
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sumario: El seguro de Decesos seguirá creciendo en volumen de primas y ganado relevancia en canales donde históricamente tenía menos importancia, como en el canal Corredores. Así de confiado se muestra Carlos Díez, director del Canal Corredores de Santalucía. Las razones que expone es que se trata de un ramo rentable para los corredores. Tienen una vida media larga, fideliza la cartera de clientes, el coste de gestión para el corredor es bajo, las comisiones interesantes y el servicio en la prestación de alta calidad. Además este servicio lo realiza íntegramente la aseguradora y eso aporta un gran margen al corredor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.166
Threshold uncertainty score0.331

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMAPFRE (Fundación Mapfre)Same topicTransport and Economic PoliciesFrench-language works237,207