MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7009006104

Design and implementation of a leader-follower controller for a wheel-legged robot

2015· dissertation· en· W7009006104 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotic Locomotion and Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsController (irrigation)RobotRoboticsMobile robotKinematicsRange (aeronautics)Control theory (sociology)Inverse kinematicsOpen-loop controller
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Leader-follower formation control of mobile robots has been investigated by many researchers in the robotics community to control multi-robot systems. This control method can coordinate a team of unmanned vehicles by manoeuvering each robot to maintain its desired position with respect to the leader of the formation. The leader-follower control strategy can also be applied to implement human-follower behaviours on mobile robots. In this thesis, a leader-follower controller was developed for the Micro-Hydraulic Toolkit (MHT), a quadruped wheel-legged robot designed by Defence Research and Development Canada (DRDC) at the Suffield Research Centre. Previously, a velocity-based inverse kinematics controller was designed and implemented on the vehicle to control its posture. However, since the MHT does not have a steering mechanism for its wheels, this controller is unable to execute turning manoeuvres with the robot. Therefore, a separate controller was developed in order to steer the MHT to achieve leader-follower formation control. The purpose of the leader-follower controller is to compute the desired wheel velocities of the robot to reach and maintain a desired range and bearing with respect to a designated leader. To implement the controller on the physical robot, a vision algorithm was developed to measure the range and bearing of the leader with respect to the MHT using a monocular camera. A wide range of leader-follower scenarios was executed in simulation using a high fidelity physics-based model of the Toolkit and on the physical platform of the MHT to assess the performance of the leader-follower controller. The results of these tests demonstrated that the controller developed is successfully capable of executing leader-follower behaviours with the MHT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.624
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicRobotic Locomotion and ControlFrench-language works237,207