MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7009013682

Detection of hybridization between Castanea dentata (Marsh.) Boorkh. and non-native congeners in Ontario

2006· dissertation· en· W7009013682 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2006
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant and Fungal Interactions Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHybridInterspecific hybridizationMorphology (biology)Genetic markerPopulation geneticsTaxonomy (biology)Hybrid zone
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The fungal pathogen, 'Cryphonectria parasitica', introduced to North America in the early 20th century, has reduced natural populations of 'Castanea dentata' (American chestnut) by 99 percent. The remaining individuals are often interspersed with non-native ' Castanea' species; however, the existence of hybrids has not been tested. My research characterizes four putative parental species morphologically and genetically (randomly amplified polymorphic DNA), and examines the remnant ' Castanea' populations of southern Ontario for hybrids. Both methods were able to distinguish between 'C. dentata' and three non-native ' Castanea' species, but only the molecular techniques could clearly identify nonnative and hybrid 'Castanea' trees in Ontario forests. One hybrid of American and Japanese chestnut species was detected in an Ontario woodlot, showing for the first time that non-native genetic material is entering the Canadian 'C. dentata' population. Canadian chestnut is also somewhat distinct from American chestnut in morphology and genetics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.803
Threshold uncertainty score0.931

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)Same topicPlant and Fungal Interactions ResearchFrench-language works237,207