MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7009066376

Dor na dismenorreia primária: caracterização sintomática e efeito da tens e do exercício físico

2022· article· en· W7009066376 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMenstrual Health and Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbdomenObservational studyMenstruationRandomized controlled trialQuality of life (healthcare)Physical exercisePain catastrophizingAnthropometry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Primary dysmenorrhea (PD) is defined as colic in the lower abdomen with no pelvic disease. Despite its high incidence, PD is poorly studied, so that its etiology, risk factors and effective forms of treatment are still not well known. Therefore, the objectives of the current study were 1) to present the main pain characteristics, psycho-emotional elements, menstrual and social profile of patients with PD, verifying possible relationships between these data; 2) study the benefits of short- and long-term treatment with TENS; 3) analyze the effects of the association between TENS and physical exercise. Methods: This is a research with three experimental phases, the first is a cross-sectional observational study and the second a placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial. 37 women were included. Outcomes analyzed in all phases were: pain intensity at rest, during abdominal contraction and during mechanical pressure on the abdomen and physical fatigue (11-point numerical scale), pressure pain threshold (algometry), central sensitization (temporal summation) , conditioned pain modulation (conditioned pain modulation), pain catastrophizing (pain catastrophizing questionnaire), pain characterization (McGill pain questionnaire), motor performance (6-minute walk test), motivation, international questionnaire of physical activity (level of physical activity), which (motivation inventory for regular physical activity), quality of life (quality of life issues). Demographic, anthropometric and menstruation characterization data were also collected. In the second experimental phase, the intervention consisted of three months of application only of TENS (active or placebo), for three menstrual cycles, in the first two days of menstruation, while in the third phase, three months of physical exercises were applied. Core Training type and High Intensity Interval Training, twice a week. Results: In the first phase of the study, the analysis of sample characteristics showed a relationship between quality of life and age (r=0.537; p=0.035; β=1.610); quality of life and catastrophizing (r=0.532; p=0.001; β=1.737); functional mobility and age (r=0.375; p=0.027; β=-4.947); mobility and pain intensity in movement (r=0.334; p=0.050; β=-8.030); bleeding flow and age at menarche (OR=70.25; β=20.370; 95% CI 14.08-35.03); duration of menstruation and bleeding flow (OR=1.25; β=-20.493; CI=95% 2.17-7.27). In the second phase, we observed that, compared to the placebo group, active TENS reduced pain intensity at rest on days 3 (p=0.036; d=0.34; CI=95% -0.31-1.00), 4 (p=0.014; d=0.40; 95% CI -0.25-1.06) and 5 (p=0.044; d=0.33; 95% CI -0.32-0.98) of treatment; reduction in the intensity of pain in movement on days 3 (p=0.04; d=0.34; CI=95% -0.31-0.99), 4 (p=0.02; d=0.36 , CI=95% -0.29-1.01) and 5 (p=0.03; d=0.36; CI=95% -0.29-1.01); reduction in pain intensity during mechanical pressure on day 6 (p=0.019; d= 0.39; CI=95% -0.27-1.04); increased quality of life (p=0.001; d=0.55; CI=95% -0.11-1.21) and decreased fatigue (p=0.017; d=0.83; CI=95% 0. 16-1.50). In the third experimental phase, there was no difference between groups in any of the variables. Conclusion: TENS reduced pain intensity at rest, movement and during pressure on the abdomen, in addition to improving fatigue, quality of life and pain characterization. When previously applied, active TENS was not effective in enhancing the effect of physical exercise, denoting that the phenomenon of central desensitization did not occur.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.963
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)Same topicMenstrual Health and DisordersFrench-language works237,207