DESA1002 'Nine Quarter City' - <Deny Majikina>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A city with that moves towards the future with a lot of history and issues it needs to work on, but still, it shows a lot of hope and it’s reflected in its culture and its people. Our project was one of those dream projects, to imagine you can grab a big piece of land and gather as many architects, one trying to work on a specific area, to create a place with personality. It’s something that will certainly happen in the future as many new cities are already being developed. My building was a bit of a struggle as I was finding something that could show my personal style and also show a bit of tradition in it. Working on the structure was hard but interesting, the metal structure was my favourite moment of the whole process. I decided to work on something simple as the building itself didn’t have much space to breath. The topic of the building was related to the project in a way. The mixture of cultures, the belonging to everything and nothing. Being willing to be open and enjoy what’s there. As people travel and cultures start blending, we will be able to experience the world in one second, in one place.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".