Descenso testicular e características seminais à puberdade e maturidade sexual em cães da raça Retriever do Labrador
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this work was to study testicular descent in Labrador Retriever dogs and also the age of these dogs at puberty and sexual maturity. The testicles were not detectable at the inguinal area at two days after birth, but on the tenth week (10 + 0.44) after birth they were palpable in the neck region of the scrotum and remained so detected to the twelfth week (12 + 0.78). The testicles were detected proximal to the scrotum from the thirteenth week (13 + 0.78) to the fifteenth week (15 + 0.78). The testicles became palpable in the scrotum at the sixteenth week (16 + 0.78). The considered puberty began when the first spermatozoa appeared in the ejaculate and it happened at the age of twenty nine weeks (29 + 0.54). By the regression analysis, in the post pubertal phase, the ejaculate showed a decrease in the percentage of major and of total defects, and on the other hand an increase of the progressive motility, spermatozoa waves movements, sperm vigor, spermatozoa concentration and total number of spermatozoa. At the age of forty three weeks (43 + 1.12) the dogs achieved sexual maturity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".