Documentation and Valorization of Convents of Minor Orders \nand the Most Important Pilgrimage Sites in Tuscany. The Case Study \nof San Vivaldo in Montaione (FI)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The complex of the Sacro Monte and the Convent of San Vivaldo is considered one of the \nmost interesting places of pilgrimage in Tuscany. Its location is of high landscape value, and \nin 1984, it was declared a national monument. San Vivaldo represents one of the most significant \npoints within the network of places of pilgrimage and devotion represented by the \nSacred Mountains. The complex today consists of the Church, the Convent and eighteen \nchapels located in the green around the convent complex, which, in the original project \n(first quarter of the sixteenth century), ideally reproduced the Holy City of Jerusalem. The \nconvent and church were built at the beginning of the 16th century. The complex was studied \nby designing a 3D digital survey using the appropriate technologies to provide the metric, \nmorphological and material knowledge necessary for the property’s documentation, preservation \nand enhancement
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".