MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7009217588

Diseño y simulación paso a paso de un inversor didáctico

2022· dissertation· es· W7009217588 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRepositorio de Patentes de la Universidad de Almería (Universidad de Almería) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languagees
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicMultidisciplinary Science and Engineering Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)Quarter (Canadian coin)Population
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A lo largo de sus estudios, los alumnos de ingeniería eléctrica e ingeniería electrónica han visto en varias asignaturas la necesidad de usar inversores. Sin embargo, pese a la importancia que estos dispositivos tienen en la actualidad en diferentes aplicaciones como en las energías renovables, la explicación de su funcionamiento se queda en la parte de potencia, sin profundizar en su diseño práctico. Por tanto, en este trabajo se explica porque estos aparatos son tan importantes y cómo construir uno con fines didácticos desde su etapa de diseño y simulación hasta la creación del circuito impreso. Además de las medidas para comprobar su funcionamiento.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.278
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0060.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it