3D Modeling with Reusable and Integrated Building Blocks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The creation of highly detailed components presented in this paper builds upon our previously introduced technique for creating complete models from only a small number of measured seed points. Here, we aim at increasing the level of automation in 3D reconstruction of scenes from a small number of images. We build highly detailed model components, for example; windows, columns, groin-vaulted ceilings elements, and arches with large number of automatically created points. The components are created to be reusable in other parts of the model, or any other model, which are similar in shape, but may vary in dimensions. Our approach works directly on the images and performs accurate transformations and scaling automatically without trials and errors. We developed a copy and paste procedure that automatically re-triangulates the base model to account for the pasted element. By creating reusable higher-level building blocks that can be integrated to form a highly detailed model, a growing library of image-based reusable components will materialize. This will significantly reduce the effort, time, and expertise required to create detailed 3D models from images.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it