MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7009354814

Efficient authentication scheme for cross-trust domain of IoV based on double-layer shard blockchain

2023· article· en· W7009354814 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlockchain Technology Applications and Security
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAuthentication (law)ScalabilityOverhead (engineering)Data Authentication AlgorithmMessage authentication codeAuthentication protocolLightweight Extensible Authentication ProtocolEmail authenticationScheme (mathematics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To solve the problems of poor scalability, slow synchronization of authentication information, and high authentication overhead in cross-trust domain message authentication in the Internet of vehicles (IoV), an efficient authentication scheme for cross-trust domain of IoV based on a double-layer shard blockchain was proposed.A double-layer shard blockchain architecture was designed for lots of cross-trust domain message authentication by constructing blockchains on different entity levels in all domains to improve the scalability of the system and ensure secure and efficient sharing of cross-domain information.A blockchain sharding method based on the Metis graph partitioning algorithm for IoV was proposed to balance loads of each shard and adapt to the uneven distribution of authentication information on different road segments in IoV, thereby improving the efficiency of synchronizing a large number of authentication information on the chain.A batch authentication scheme based on certificateless public-key cryptography (CL-PKC) was proposed, which reduced the authentication overhead of cross-domain messages by enabling batch authentication of messages from different trust domains.Experimental results show that the proposed scheme effectively improves the authentication efficiency of cross-trust domain messages.Compared with other schemes, the proposed scheme reduces the computational overhead of a large number of cross-domain message authentication by more than 26.4%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.186
GPT teacher head0.518
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Same topicBlockchain Technology Applications and Security→French-language works237,207→