MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7009368639

Econometric Analyses of Cardiac Arrest in Ontario, Canada

2022· dissertation· en· W7009368639 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResuscitationFalse positive paradoxLogistic regressionOddsCardiopulmonary resuscitationPopulationOdds ratioInformation bias
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cardiac arrest is a major cause of mortality and morbidity including recurring cardiac events, cognitive impairments, and mental health issues. This thesis is on empirical analyses of cardiac arrest patients in Ontario, Canada using administrative health data sources. Chapter 1 is a retrospective population surveillance study, which employs logistic regression analysis to examine short-term and long-term survival trends for adult patients in acute care hospitals. The 1-year adjusted odds ratio for initial successful resuscitation is 1.049 (95% CI: 1.022-1.076) when controlling for demographics, pre-admission comorbidities, and hospital of arrest. In stark contrast, there was no evidence of a trend in survival at discharge, 30 days, or 1 year. Results suggest further research into post-resuscitation care in Ontario care may be useful. However, we also find evidence of measurement error coding in successful resuscitation that is trending in magnitude in way that could bias trend estimates. Chapter 2 takes a serious look at the nonclassical measurement error problem in resuscitation success coding identified in the previous chapter. We employ a combination of credible assumptions from within the partial identification econometrics literature to nonparametrically bound the trend is resuscitation while allowing misclassification rates to trend. We also develop a novel approach which weakly restricts asymmetry between false positive and negative rates. We find that restricting false positives and negative to be within 10% and 90% of misclassified observations, in combination with monotonicity assumptions is enough to identify a trend. Chapter 3 follows survivors of cardiac arrest after discharge and investigates follow-up patterns in primary care. These patients remain at high risk of death, recurrence of cardiac events, cognitive impairment, and mental health issues. They may benefit from ongoing monitoring of cardiac risk factors, early mental health screening, and co-ordination of specialist care. This requires continuity of primary care. Primary care reforms in Ontario, Canada have led to the majority of general practitioners (GP) switching from fee-for-service remuneration to enhanced patient enrolment models, which encourage or require GPs to formally enroll most patients attached to their practice. To understand continuity of care across payment models, we use semi-parametric duration models to analyze time to first GP outpatient follow-up visit, distinguishing visits a patient’s own regular GP, and other GPs. We find enrolled patients visit their own (other) GP earlier (later) compared to patients whose regular GP is fee-for-service.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.309

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacSphere (McMaster University)→Same topicSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→