MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7009374289

Edible Seaweeds of the Salish Sea: Contaminant Levels and Comparison with Common Foods

2021· article· en· W7009374289 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueWestern CEDAR (Western Washington University) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSeaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEcotoxicologyContaminationPollutantAlgaeCadmiumHeavy metalsWater pollution
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To increase our seafood safety knowledge with respect to seaweed, this study compares contaminant concentrations in three species of edible seaweeds (Fucus distichus, F. spiralis, and Nereocystis luetkeana) harvested from 43 locations within the Salish Sea from June to September 2015. Fucus spp. were analyzed for 162 chemicals: 17 metals, 94 persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and 51 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Nereocystis luetkeana was analyzed for metal content. Two health-based screening levels were calculated, one on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Reference Dose (RfD) and the other on the USEPA Cancer Slope Factor (CSF) when these data were available. Concentrations of Cd, Pb, total PCBs and the PAH benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) at each site were compared to the screening levels (SLs). Concentration of Pb, Cd and Hg were also compared to the French regulations in 2014, for these metals in seaweeds. Generally, contaminants in Salish Sea seaweeds were below detection levels. Concentrations of total PCBs were all below the RfD SL but concentrations in F. distichus at ten of 43 sites and F. spiralis at one of three sites had concentrations above the cancer-based SL. Concentrations of all PAHs at all sites were below the RfD, but BaP concentrations of F. distichus at one of 43 sites and F. spiralis at one of three sites had concentrations above the cancer-based SL. Both sites were in Victoria Harbour, Canada. Screening levels could not be calculated for Pb because no RfDs and CSFs exist. Concentrations in F. distichus at three sites in Victoria Harbour were above the Frenchlegal limit (5 mg/kgdw) for edible seaweeds. Levels of Cd were lower than RfD-based SLs, however, all samples were higher than French legal limit (0.5 mg/kgdw). Total arsenic (tAs) was detected at all sites and ranged from (16-99 mg/kgdw). Concentrations of contaminants in serving sized portions of seaweed samples were compared to concentrations in portions of common foods and within the same general ranges for levels of PCBs, BaP, tAs, Pb, Hg, and Cd contaminants. An important note is that we have reanalyzed the data since the writing of this thesis, although, overall, the results and conclusions have not changed, I would direct you toward that publication for citations of my work (Hahn et al., 2021, in prep.).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it