Economic Analysis for Thermal Treatment of Wastepaper in Saskatchewan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Changing recycling markets and fluctuating market prices for wastepaper are increasing the financial risks for Saskatchewan municipalities and their waste disposal practices. Landfilling is generally considered the lowest cost alternative while recycling, although considered to be the right thing to do environmentally, can be cost prohibitive. The increasing demand for non-fossil fuel-based energy sources may present an opportunity for municipalities to economically generate heat and in some cases, power, through thermal treatment of wastepaper utilizing incineration with heat recovery or combined heat and power units. Barriers to the adoption are the upfront financial cost and lack of consolidated information required to perform a feasibility analysis. This thesis consolidates the information required for municipalities to conduct a first-pass feasibility analysis. Supporting information and data was collected to provide: a summary of technology, referenced values for the availability of wastepaper, capital costs for construction of thermal treatment plants, and expected values for heat and power production and sales. This data is intended for use by municipalities to evaluate thermal treatment of wastepaper. To assist with the evaluation, a Decision Support Tool (DST) was then developed to provide an automated economic evaluation of thermal treatment plants operating on wastepaper based on inputs from the user (municipality) and from available literature. Saskatoon, Swift Current, Outlook, and La Loche in Saskatchewan, Canada, were used as case studies for the evaluation of wastepaper thermal treatment in Saskatchewan. Saskatoon is the largest city in Saskatchewan with a population of approximately 250,000. Swift Current is the mid-point of the ten largest Saskatchewan municipalities, approximately 17,000. Outlook is the tenth largest municipality, approximately 2,300. La Loche, approximate population of 2,300 was selected to evaluate a Northern community. The selected municipalities also serve to evaluate a large population range within Saskatchewan with approximately an order of magnitude difference between each municipality. Using the developed DST for the case studies indicated that thermal treatment of wastepaper in the four locations has the potential to provide a disposal cost lower than recycling. In all cases, capital cost was the main driver, with operating and maintenance costs as the secondary driver, of the viability of thermal treatment of wastepaper compared to landfilling or recycling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".