MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7009500798

Epitaxial growth, characterization and solar cell application of indium nitride nanowires on silicon

2009· dissertation· en· W7009500798 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2009
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanowire Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies
KeywordsSolar cellRenewable energyEpitaxyHeterojunctionNanowireSolar energyIndium nitrideIndiumFossil fuel
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present global energy crisis can be attributed to excessive greenhouse gas emissions arising from escalating fossil fuel consumption in addition to limited fossil fuel supplies. The great demand for clean energy and renewable power can potentially be resolved by utilizing the process of solar energy conversion. However, the extensive usage of solar energy is not happening due to the high cost and insufficient efficiencies in existing solar cell devices. Nanostructured materials, particularly one-dimensional (1-D) nanowires (NWs), have provided new opportunities to enhance the efficiency by enabling improved photon absorption, electron transport as well as collection, at a reduced processing cost. Particularly, InN has become an attractive material for constructing NWs due to its high electron mobility, high chemical stability, low toxicity, and a narrow bandgap of ~ 0.7 eV that can be tuned to ~ 3.4 eV by incorporating Ga, which essentially encompasses the whole solar spectrum. In this thesis, epitaxial growth and characterization of superior quality InN NWs vertically grown on Si, as well as the first demonstration of InN NWs on Si heterojunction solar cell will be presented. Keywords: nanowire, epitaxial growth, solar cell

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.254
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicNanowire Synthesis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207