MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7009566092

Evaluating the parasitoid wasp Jaliscoa hunteri for biological control of pepper weevil (Anthonomus eugenii) in Canadian greenhouses

2022· dissertation· en· W7009566092 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect-Plant Interactions and Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPepperBiological pest controlWeevilIntegrated pest managementPEST analysisInstar
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Canadian pepper greenhouses, the pepper weevil (Anthonomus eugenii) is an economically important pest that currently has no commercially available biological control agent. In this thesis, the potential of parasitoid wasp Jaliscoa hunteri, a natural enemy of pepper weevil previously detected in Canada, is investigated. In laboratory trials, the wasp reduced pepper weevil adult emergence by up to 62% and was most effective in smaller-sized fruit. The volatile organic compounds of pepper plants infested with adult and larval pepper weevil were collected and differences in emissions were compared to non-infested plants. In Y-tube olfactometry assays, J. hunteri moved predominately towards peppers infested with early or late instar pepper weevils and towards chickpeas infested with late instar cowpea weevils, its factitious laboratory host. These results highlight this parasitoid as a candidate biological control agent and encourage further research towards its inclusion in integrated pest management programs for pepper weevil in Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.725
Threshold uncertainty score0.546

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)→Same topicInsect-Plant Interactions and Control→French-language works237,207→