Efusión pericárdica recurrente en un labrador con una masa sobre el atrio derecho: Reporte de un caso clínico
Bibliographic record
Abstract
"Este artículo describe el caso clínico de un perro de raza labrador, de nueve años de edad que fue llevado a consulta porque presentaba anorexia, distensión abdominal por ascitis, depresión e intolerancia al ejercicio. Al examen clínico se detectaron sonidos cardiacos poco audibles, un pulso femoral débil, taquicardia, taquipnea y presencia de pulso yugular. Los métodos diagnósticos complementarios permitieron determinar que el paciente se encontraba en una tamponada cardiaca por efusión pericárdica (EP). Se realizó una pericardiocentesis y el líquido extraído era de probable origen neoplásico. A los cinco meses el paciente presentó nuevamente tamponada cardíaca por efusión pericárdica, repitiéndose la pericardiocentesis. En esta ocasión se detectó por ecocardiografía una masa de 0.5 cm de diámetro en la pared externa del atrio derecho compatible con un hemangiosarcoma primario."
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".