MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7009600773

Effects of Lidocaine on Post-Tonsillectomy Pain in Children: A Triple-Blind Clinical Trial

2013· article· en· W7009600773 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLidocaineTonsillectomyPlaceboSedationLaryngospasmNauseaSalineClinical trial
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Tonsillectomy is one of the most common surgical operations in children. It has complications such as pain, hemorrhage, laryngospasm, postoperative nausea, and vomiting. Post- tonsillectomy pain management is vital in reducing the suffering and restlessness of children. Several methods have been suggested to preventing and treat post-tonsillectomy pain. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of preoperative peritonsillar injection of lidocaine and placebo on postoperative pain relief. Methods: This randomized, triple-blind clinical trial was conducted on sixty 3-12-year-old children who were candidate for tonsillectomy in Imam Khomeini Hospital (Ardabil, Iran). Children were randomly assigned to the lidocaine or placebo group. Anesthesia was induced similarly for all patients. Peritonsillar injections of 1 mg/kg lidocaine (per 2 ml volume) and 2 ml normal saline were performed for the lidocaine and placebo groups, respectively. Patients’ vital signs were recorded in before the induction of anesthesia, during the operation, and in the recovery room. Pain was assessed by using the self-report Oucher Scale and the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale. Sedation state was also assessed through the Wilson Sedation Scale. Side effects such as nausea and vomiting, rebleeding after surgery, dyspnea, apnea, and laryngospasm were studied and recorded in the recovery room and 24 hours after the surgery. Data was analyzed with chi-square test, Student’s t-test, and repeated measures analysis of variance. Findings: Based on the Oucher Scale, the mean pain score in the lidocaine group was lower than the placebo group at the 5th, 15th, 30th, 60th, 120th and 240th minutes after the surgery. However, the difference was only statistically significant at the 240th postoperative minute (P = 0.03). The average sedation score in the placebo group was higher than the lidocaine group at the 15th and 30th minutes after the surgery (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of rebleeding, need for oxygen, dyspnea, apnea, period of recovery room stay, and the need for painkillers in morning after the surgery. Conclusion: Preoperative peritonsillar injection of lidocaine was effective in reducing postoperative pain in children. Moreover, it did not result in any critical side effects during recovery and the first 24 hours after surgery. Thus, we certainly can use lidocaine for reducing postoperative pain in children. Keywords: Tonsillectomy, Lidocaine, Postoperative pain, Children, Peritonsillar

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.197
GPT teacher head0.573
Teacher spread0.376 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Same topicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research→French-language works237,207→