MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7009614998

Emile Smissaert over de "Alberta", het yacht van Leopold II

2001· article· nl· W7009614998 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFlanders Marine Institute (Flanders Marine Institute) · 2001
Typearticle
Languagenl
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Art and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelation (database)Subject (documents)Work (physics)Field (mathematics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Eén der oudste nieuwsbladen uit Oostende was de Feuille d'Annonces.We kregen een deel van de jaargang 3 en 4 (periode 16 november 1820-27 december 1821) te zien en lazen volgende muzikale items samen :1 februari 1821 : Ene J. Govaerts biedt een aantal muziekpartituren te koop aan en twee muziekinstrumenten, nl.een serpent (de slangvormige voorloper van de ophicleïde en de tuba) en een hoorn met daarbij alle wisselstukken om in diverse toonaarden te kunnen spelen (er bestonden nog geen ventielen).9 april 1821 Aankondiging van een "Concert Vocal & Instrumental" in de Salie de la Rhétorique (Franciscusstraat 30), door Mr. Duquenoy, Chef d'Orchestre.14 juni 1821 : De Oostendse muziekleraar Christiaens, Rue du Carénage (Werfstraat), biedt een piano van 5 1/4 oktaaf en met 4 pedalen te koop aan.21 juni 1821 Optreden in de "Salie de Spectacle" van "Les Quatre Chanteurs de Vienne" (Schiele, Kaplan, Fellauer & Daeubler) die a-capella (zonder instrumentale begeleiding dus ) zang en gezongen interpretaties van muzikale nummers brachten.Een verre voorloper van de barbershop-singers en Voice-mail dus, die, als we de Feuille d'Annonce mogen geloven, groot succes kenden in Parijs en andere Europese steden.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.387
Threshold uncertainty score0.769

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0430.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFlanders Marine Institute (Flanders Marine Institute)Same topicHistorical Art and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207