MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7009706336

The evolution of «Mycobacterium tuberculosis»: the mycobacterial SigK-RskA regulatory system

2010· other· en· W7009706336 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2010
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMycobacterium tuberculosisTuberculosisComparative genomicsGenomicsGeneMycobacterium tuberculosis complexHorizontal gene transfer
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mycobacteria genus comprises bacteria pathogenic for humans and animals, including M. tuberculosis complex (MTC). In the past decade, considerable research has focused on genomic studies differences between MTC strains and sub-species. These data largely address the devolution of MTC organisms, through a process of reductive genomics and single nucleotide polymorphisms. We hypothesized that these findings present an incomplete evolutionary scenario for the pathogen M. tuberculosis. To test this possibility, we have conducted comparative genomic analysis among sequenced mycobacteria to look for evidence of horizontal gene transfers during the evolution of the genus. Using a bioinformatic screen, we predicted a number of foreign genes acquisitions during the step-wise genesis of M. tuberculosis. Along with others, this study emphasizes another side of the evolution of M. tuberculosis and demonstrates that before the process of genomic decay, M. tuberculosis had acquired foreign genes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.155

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)→Same topicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender→French-language works237,207→