Evaluation of suffering and distress in breast cancer patients of Indian heritage undergoing treatment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Breast cancer is now the most common cancer among women in India. The rising incidence is thought to be due to increased life expectancy, urbanisation, and adoption of western lifestyles. However, little is known about the psychological impact of the disease and its treatment among women of Indian heritage living anywhere in the world, and how their culture influences their experience of cancer-related psychological concerns.Aim. To improve the knowledge about the psychological concerns among Indian heritage women with breast cancer on treatment and what helps to relieve or worsen these distresses. I also aimed to explore the cultural context within which Indian women with breast cancer living in India experience the psychological concerns, and its impact. Methods. To understand what is already known about the psychological concerns of Indian women with breast cancer living anywhere in the world, I conducted a mixed-methods systematic literature review using Centre for Reviews and Dissemination methods, and modified critical interpretive synthesis, through the lens of cultural distress theory. To explore the experience of distress/suffering as well as factors affecting them, in Indian women with breast cancer living in India with special focus on patients undergoing treatment, I conducted in-depth interviews with 20 women from Kerala undergoing treatment for breast cancer. To investigate the cultural context in which Indian women with breast cancer experience their disease and treatment I conducted five focus groups with (health care workers (2 groups)) lay public (3 groups). Both interview and focus groups were conducted in the regional language (Malayalam) and English as indicated, verbatim transcribed, translated into English, and back translated and data subjected to thematic analysis. Cultural distress and cultural task analysis theories were used to underpin the primary qualitative studies.Findings The available data from India and Canada indicate that the psychological concerns are like ‘Western’ women but are experienced within a common culture of Indian women. Family structure, religion and community appear to both protect against and cause distress in relation to an expected core role (wife, mother, family carer), and male dominance - particularly in decision making. Both qualitative studies described psychological impact relating to body image, particularly hair loss, change of family role and their need for support. Like the review findings, family and faith were recognised as the major framework providing key support but also significant stress. Both clinicians and lay groups were also concerned about the financial implications of the disease and its treatment, and issues around lack of early cancer detection. Lay people and nurses also commented that poor communication and lack of empathy from doctors aggravated distress.Conclusion Indian women with breast cancer living in India and Canada experience psychological morbidities which profoundly affect, and are affected by, their role in their family and the wider community. Culturally congruent care, including accessible communication and information, may help prevent and alleviate distress whether in India or in a migrant community. Clinical and lay communities were aware of the widespread psychological impact affecting women with breast cancer which are amplified by the patriarchal context within which they live. Family and faith provide a strong support structure but are also a cause of distress, as core roles and expectations are challenged by this disease of womanhood. These insights are useful for clinicians aiming to provide culturally congruent breast cancer care for Indian women anywhere in the world.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".