MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7009735171

Fashioning flax: Industry, region, and work in North American fibre and linseed oil, 1850-1930

2009· dissertation· en· W7009735171 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2009
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAppalachian Studies and Mathematics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of TorontoNorth Dakota State UniversityNDSU Development Foundation
KeywordsLinumClothingWork (physics)AgricultureCropSymbol (formal)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

More flax was grown on the temperate grasslands of the Americas than in all the linen producing countries of Europe, and by the 1850s most of the crop was used to make paint. Flax has become a symbol of pioneer self sufficiency, but in British North America its main story begins on established Canadian farms in the mid nineteenth century and ends with an extensive Prairie flax belt. This thesis is about the industrial and intellectual fashioning of flax and flax products, and the adaptability of producers to new markets and environments. It finds that flax in North America was not about homespun and self-sufficiency but about industrial production driven by demand for intermediate fibre products and the emerging oilseed sector. By the nineteenth century, North American flax appeared in vehicles and houses more than clothing and bedding. Flax fibre was usually for manufacturing upholstery, cordage, and rough textiles such as sails and grain bags, and flax seed produced linseed oil, the foundation for paint, varnish, and linoleum. In both its forms, flax demonstrates how commodities disappeared into a world of manufactured goods, and how spurious images develop over time. The romantic story of independent yeomen bringing flax from field to fabric is presented at most pioneer museums, but the real picture would include complex intermediate goods in carriages, homes, and furniture; family and First Nations work gangs harvesting flax owned by millers, not farmers; and Mennonites and other sodbusters bringing extensive flax cultivation to new land through market and contract prices set by large integrated enterprise. The process of painting was connected to the process of farming, and in Canada consuming colour meant cultivating the plains. The plant grew quickly on new breaking and best on land that was free of disease, and therefore it became a significant first crop on some of the most fragile and unforgiving northern grasslands. Over two centuries of flax fibre promotion by state and farm officials have had little effect on the flax industry, and where flax did appear it was as part of market-responsive and environmentally-innovative adaptations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.629
Threshold uncertainty score0.935

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it