MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7009768868

Feature Story: Professor’s notes shed new light on the patriation process for Canada’s Constitution

2017· other· en· W7009768868 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueoURspace (University of Regina) · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConstitutionNegotiationFeature (linguistics)PoliticsProcess (computing)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Generations from now, scholars will no doubt thank Dr. Howard Leeson for his extraordinary note-taking skills. Leeson, Adjunct Professor and Professor Emeritus of Politics and International Studies, was Saskatchewan’s Deputy Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs during the constitutional negotiations 35 years ago. From his unobstructed access to the talks and the behind-the-scenes negotiations, Leeson took detailed and copious notes as a member of the Saskatchewan negotiating team. He was one of the few who even bothered taking out a notepad.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.951
Threshold uncertainty score0.358

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0270.005
Scholarly communication0.0100.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0060.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueoURspace (University of Regina)→Same topicFish Ecology and Management Studies→French-language works237,207→