MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7009808095

Exploring context in parent-adolescent conflict – A comparison between Canada and Sweden

2020· other· en· W7009808095 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueÖrebro University Library (Örebro University) · 2020
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Corporate governanceConflict resolutionInternal conflictConflict management
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The research question was whether there are differences in parentadolescentconflict across the domains of governance transfer betweenCanada and Sweden. Participants were students in classes 7 – 9, aged 13 –16 years old. Results show that the amount of conflict differed acrosscultures, across domains, and across genders. Parent-adolescent conflict isnot universal, but instead rather dependent on context. The Swedishadolescents´ reported significantly more conflict-level discussions than theCanadian adolescents´. Regarding the same issue that the Swedishadolescents reported having a lower conflict resolution, suggesting thathaving a conflict-level discussion makes it harder to reach a conflictresolution. The results of this research suggests that conflict among parentand adolescents is uncommon. What was more common was discussionsabout issues across the domains of governance transfer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.297
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.112 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÖrebro University Library (Örebro University)French-language works237,207