MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7009861504

Feedback in Hausarbeitenkonferenzen geben und nehmen

2019· other· de· W7009861504 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) · 2019
Typeother
Languagede
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Control (management)Set (abstract data type)Face (sociological concept)Perspective (graphical)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lahm S, Hoebel T, Kühl S. Feedback in Hausarbeitenkonferenzen geben und nehmen. In: Wymann C, ed. <em>Praxishandbuch Schreibdidaktik. Übungen zur Vermittlung wissenschaftlicher Schreibkompetenzen</em>. Opladen & Toronto: Barbara Budrich; 2019: 284-289.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Bibliometrics, Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.250
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0160.014
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0080.005
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.067

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University)French-language works237,207