Forma e contenuto del giudizio scolastico. Elementi per un dibattito
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper offers a reading of the lemma 'judgment' (evaluati on) from a terminological-conceptual point of \nview, indicating its purposes, forms of structuring and contents. The expression of judgment constitutes the \nmoment of external communication of the students' academic performance. The Italian school system \nprovides that the evaluation judgment is made at the end of a quarter or a quarter of a school year. The form \nthat a judgment can take varies: from the numerical grade using ordinal scales of different extension (in \ntenths in the school, in hundredths in the high school exam, in thirty in the university exams) to the \nformulation through the use of literal or verbal scales. The Italian school has used all three of these types. \nThe content of the judgment varies according to the purposes for which it is formulated. The intermediate \njudgment will present proactive and prognostic contents, the final one will accentuate the orienting function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it