MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7009906122

First descriptions of nodular gill disease in italian farmed rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)

2015· article· en· W7009906122 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Padua Archive (University of Padua) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicAquaculture disease management and microbiota
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRainbow troutGillOutbreakTroutJuvenileAquatic animalMucus
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

FIRST DESCRIPTIONS OF NODULAR GILL DISEASE IN ITALIAN FARMED 
\nRAINBOW TROUT (ONCORHYNCHUS MYKISS) 
\nF. QUAGLIO 1 *, A. PEROLO 1 , P. BRONZATTI 2 , A. GUSTINELLI 3 , V. MENCONI 3 , G. 
\nCAVAZZA 3 , M. CAFFARA 3 , A. MANFRIN 4 , E. GALLO 1 , M.L. FIORAVANTI 3
\n1 University of Padova, Italy 
\n2 Veterinarian fish pathologist 
\n3 Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Italy 
\n4 Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Padova, Italy 
\nAmoebic gill disease is a severe parasitic condition affecting salmonid farming in marine and 
\nfreshwater environment. Several outbreaks of nodular gill disease associated with amoebic 
\ninfections in freshwater farms of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) have been reported in 
\nDenmark, Poland, Germany, USA and Canada. Some cases of nodular gill disease in juvenile 
\nand adult rainbow trout have been observed during the last three years in some trout farms in 
\nnorthern and central Italy. High mortality rates occurred throughout the year, with a higher 
\nseverity and incidence at low temperatures. Clinical signs were indicative of respiratory distress. 
\nGross pathology observations of gills showed excessive mucus production, whitish nodules in 
\nthe distal regions of filaments and alternated anemic and congested areas. The nodules 
\ncommonly were composed of several adjacent filaments clubbed and fused together, suggesting 
\ndiffuse and severe epithelial hyperplasia. The lesions observed were evaluated utilizing a 
\ncategorical field evaluation of gross gill score. In some samples examined in spring 2014 the 
\nmicroscopic exam of fresh gill showed the presence of roundish elements of about 20 μm in 
\ndiameter referable to amoebae lined up along the gill surface or piled between the secondary 
\nlamellae. The identity of amoebae has not been determined so far and is still under study. 
\nHistological examination of gills revealed extensive proliferation of the epithelial and mucous 
\ncells, often with complete fusion of the lamellae. Lamellar oedema and leucocyte infiltration in 
\nthe hyperplastic tissue were found. The filaments in severe cases were totally coalescing, 
\nsometimes affecting the entire gill arch. The apical portion of the filament showed marked 
\nspongiosis accompanied by cellular sloughing. Amoebae, better evidenced by Giemsa staining, 
\nwere observed adhering to the gill epithelium surface and within interlamellar spaces. 
\nBacteriological exams of the gills did not support a correlation between presence of bacteria and 
\namoebic infections. Nodular gill disease of trout is an emerging problem which requires 
\nparticular attention by fish pathologists. Studies are in progress to clarify etiopathogenesis and 
\nmain environmental and biological determinants of the disease in order to define appropriate 
\nmeasures for its prevention and control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.731
Threshold uncertainty score0.866

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Padua Archive (University of Padua)Same topicAquaculture disease management and microbiotaFrench-language works237,207