Bibliographic record
Abstract
This practise-based research project aims to convey the traditional Greenlandic social, spiritual, intellectual, and artistic practice, drumdancing and drumsinging, from the perspective of a practitioner, through a film. \nSecondary, to create a website, to gather my portfolio, of current and future research projects. (www.qilaat.org.) \n \nCategorised as a performative documentary, the film “The forbidden songs” is based on the filmmaker´s ethnographic research and artistic experience combined with qualitative studies of multiple Greenlandic Inuit drumdancers, cultural knowledge keepers weaved into archival material. \nThis is the first of four chapters, which focuses on the historical aspect of drumdancing, beginning from the pre-colonial times citing the colonial era up until today. The film emphasizes the importance of revival of a cultural tradition, the once forbidden songs and its significance to the Inuit in Greenland. \nIn this reflective report I will engage you in the process of gathering and assembling the pieces to convey and contract a broad amount of information while bridging personal narratives with archival material. \nI am grateful to Inukitsoq Sadorana (Qaanaaq), Mikkel Bianco (Tasiilaq) Tukummeq Qaavigaaq (Qaanaaq), James Ignatiussen (Tasiilaq), Aanganni Mikaelsen (Tasiilaq) and Vittus Mathiassen (Tasiilaq) and Kalaallit Nunaata Radioa (KNR) for their contributions to this film. \nI learned a lot through their individual stories, and most important how the changes and loss of heritage in Greenland, affected everyone. It made the purpose of finding new ways of sharing our traditional practice, even more relevant and urgent. Furthermore, we articulated the purpose of the ancient tradition, consequences of colonization/danization and re-introduced the traditional way to heal through the practice of drumdancing and drumsinging. \nThe film is in Greenlandic, with English subtitles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".