MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7010058782

Forecasting Buffelgrass (Cenchrus ciliaris) Distributions In Southern Arizona Under Multiple Climate Change Scenarios

2022· other· en· W7010058782 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) · 2022
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClimate changeHabitatAridEcosystemCenchrus ciliaris
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Buffelgrass (Cenchrus ciliaris) is an invasive grass that can alter fire regimes, reduce local biodiversity, and convert complex arid ecosystems into buffelgrass dominated grasslands. As buffelgrass populations continue to grow, it will be important to be able to predict which areas are most susceptible to future buffelgrass invasion. This study attempts to provide some insight into this problem by creating a model to predict changes in the extent of potential buffelgrass habitat under different climate change scenarios between 2020 and 2100. Maximum entropy modelling was conducted using known occurrences of buffelgrass in the Santa Catalina mountains of Southern Arizona in combination with 19 bioclimatic variables from WorldClim to create a baseline model, which was then applied to future climatic conditions under the Canadian Earth Systems Model 5 (CanESM5) for three different climate change scenarios. The maximum entropy method produced an accurate model with an area under curve (AUC) value of 0.9913 and in validation trails it was able to accurately predict the presence of buffelgrass with 91.37% accuracy. When applied to future climatic conditions, the model showed a 280% increase in potential buffelgrass habitat under light and moderate climate change scenarios, and a 501% increase under a more severe scenario. Considering this potential for buffelgrass to spread, it may be essential for land managers to aggressively combat buffelgrass introductions to prevent it from being able to spread further and continue to damage ecosystems, as well as emphasize the importance of minimizing the impacts of climate change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.651
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)French-language works237,207