MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7010065672

The Functional Significance of Oscillatory Activities in the Basal Ganglia and Pedunculopontine Nucleus Region in Parkinsonâs Disease and Dystonia

2012· dissertation· en· W7010065672 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2012
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurological disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDystoniaGlobus pallidusBasal gangliaPedunculopontine nucleusSubthalamic nucleusElectromyographyParkinson's diseaseMotor activity
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Parkinson’s disease (PD) and dystonia are movement disorders related to dysfunctions of basal ganglia (BG). Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and internal globus pallidus (GPi) are treatments for PD and dystonia. Previous research indicated that abnormally elevated oscillatory activities at the theta (3-10 Hz) beta frequency bands (11-30 Hz) may be related to parkinsonian and dystonic motor symptoms but their precise roles are not well understood. Recently, DBS of the pedunculopontine nucleus region (PPNR) has been used to treat PD patients with postural and gait dysfunctions, but movement-related PPNR activities had not been explored. We aimed to investigate movement-related local field potentials (LFP) recorded from the BG and PPNR in PD and dystonia patients. We recorded STN LFP from PD patients and subsequently applied the intrinsic STN theta, beta, and gamma (31-100 Hz) frequencies through DBS to study their effects on PD motor signs. We also recorded movement-related PPNR LFP in PD patients and movement-related GPi activities in patients with primary dystonia. Finally, we simultaneously recorded movement-related activities from the GPi and the motor thalamus in a patient with secondary dystonia. We found that DBS at the dopamine-dependent and movement-related intrinsic STN gamma frequencies, were as effective as traditionally used high frequencies (130-185 Hz) in reducing PD motor signs, but theta and beta frequencies did not worsen motor symptoms. Voluntary movements modulated two discrete movement-related frequencies in the theta and beta bands in the PPNR and these two frequencies interacted with the sensorimotor and frontal cortices during movements. We showed that voluntary movements modulated beta and gamma frequencies in the GPi. A resting ~5-18 Hz coherence between the GPi bilaterally was attenuated during movements in patients, which may be related to dystonia because this 5-18Hz coherence was also present between the GPi and motor thalamus in the patient with secondary dystonia. Our findings indicated that intrinsic STN gamma frequency oscillations were likely prokinetic rhythms but theta and beta frequencies may not contribute to PD motor symptoms. Voluntary movements modulated theta and beta frequencies in the PPNR, which may explain why PPNR DBS uses lower frequencies than those of the BG. The 5-18 Hz oscillatory activities in the BG-thalamic circuit may be a feature of dystonia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.001

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.165
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)→Same topicNeurological disorders and treatments→French-language works237,207→